In the second test between India and Australia in the ongoing series in Brisbane. India made two changes in the team Umesh Yadav and Ashwin came back to the team replacing Mohommad Sami and Karan Sharma (also Dhoni came back to the team after missing the previous match with an injury). Both of them bowled relatively better than Sami and Karan in the previous test match. But what really cost India the test match was Indian bowling to the Australian lower order in the first innings .
Indians managed to take 6 Australian wickets for 247 runs, but the tactic they employed towards batsman Mitchell Johnson was to bounce him out and Johnson made the Indian quick bowlers pay for that. The Australian batsmen are brought up on bouncy pitches and they play short ball better than players of any other country.
Johnson comfortably hit the Indian quick bowlers all around the park and quickly got to a score of 88, if that was not enough Mitchell Stark contributed to the Australian total with another 52 of mere 59 balls. All Indian bowlers had to do was to treat them as normal batsmen and they would have surely got the Australian tail out for a lower total.
Even If India had managed to get the last 4 Australian wickets for around 150 runs , India would have had an excellent chance to win the test match because in the second innings India manged to get 6 wickets. Australia had to score 128 to win they did manage to get but after losing 6 wickets.
If India had managed to get the last 4 Australian wickets for 150 runs then the Australians would have had to score another 130 runs with last 4 wickets in hand . That would have been a very though task under pressure of chasing and the pitch has also deteriorated considerably.
One just hopes that the Indian bowlers learn that one fluke victory in England after bowling lots of short balls to the batsmen need not be repeated in the future. The Australians are a different kettle of fish, the bouncer and the short ball has to be used as a surprise weapon to them. Indian batsman must bat better and avoid such batting collapses. The tail needs to contribute a little bit more in terms of runs .
Indians managed to take 6 Australian wickets for 247 runs, but the tactic they employed towards batsman Mitchell Johnson was to bounce him out and Johnson made the Indian quick bowlers pay for that. The Australian batsmen are brought up on bouncy pitches and they play short ball better than players of any other country.
Johnson comfortably hit the Indian quick bowlers all around the park and quickly got to a score of 88, if that was not enough Mitchell Stark contributed to the Australian total with another 52 of mere 59 balls. All Indian bowlers had to do was to treat them as normal batsmen and they would have surely got the Australian tail out for a lower total.
Even If India had managed to get the last 4 Australian wickets for around 150 runs , India would have had an excellent chance to win the test match because in the second innings India manged to get 6 wickets. Australia had to score 128 to win they did manage to get but after losing 6 wickets.
If India had managed to get the last 4 Australian wickets for 150 runs then the Australians would have had to score another 130 runs with last 4 wickets in hand . That would have been a very though task under pressure of chasing and the pitch has also deteriorated considerably.
One just hopes that the Indian bowlers learn that one fluke victory in England after bowling lots of short balls to the batsmen need not be repeated in the future. The Australians are a different kettle of fish, the bouncer and the short ball has to be used as a surprise weapon to them. Indian batsman must bat better and avoid such batting collapses. The tail needs to contribute a little bit more in terms of runs .